Manchester United continued their winning run by defeating Fulham in Gameweek 24 of the 2025/2026 Premier League season.
The victory at Old Trafford ensured the Red Devils maintained their place inside the top four of the table.
Manchester United began Michael Carrick‘s tenure by defeating their city rivals, Manchester City, before following that result with an away victory against league leaders Arsenal at the Emirates Stadium.
Two major wins against leading title contenders set the tone ahead of the Fulham fixture.
This Manchester United vs Fulham tactical analysis will break down some of Michael Carrick’s tactical ideas to come away from Sunday’s game with another three points.
Manchester United Vs Fulham Lineups & Formations
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 2 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulform.png)
Manchester United lined up with a 4-2-3-1 formation.
Senne Lammens started in goal.
Manchester United’s back four was Harry Maguire and Lisandro Martínez as right and left centre-backs, with Diogo Dalot and Luke Shaw playing as right and left full-backs.
The defensive backline is behind two midfielders, Casemiro and Kobbie Mainoo, as the double pivot, who are behind the attacking midfielder, Bruno Fernandes.
Amad Diallo was Manchester United’s right winger, with Matheus Cunha on the left wing, and Bryan Mbeumo up front.
Michael Carrick made four substitutions in the match.
Benjamin Šeško (74′) came on for Cunha, Manuel Ugarte (75′) for Casemiro, Noussair Mazraoui (86’) for Dalot, and Leny Yoro (90′) came on for Mbeumo.
With a similar setup to Manchester United, Fulham lined up in a 4-2-3-1 formation.
Bernd Leno started between the sticks.
Fulham‘s back four consisted of Joachim Andersen and Jorge Cuenca at right and left centre-back, with Timothy Castagne and Antonee Robinson as right and left full-backs.
Their two midfielders were Alex Iwobi and Sander Berge, while Emile Smith Rowe played just ahead as a number ten.
Harry Wilson was Fulham‘s right winger with Samuel Chukwueze on the left and Raúl Jiménez up front.
Marco Silva also made four substitutions.
Manchester United Build-Up
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 3 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulbu1.png)
During their build-up from goal kicks, Manchester United adopted a 4-2 structure.
The first line consisted of the centre-backs and full-backs, with Harry Maguire and Lisandro Martínez positioned inside the box.
Both full-backs stayed wide, but at different heights (out of the picture).
Luke Shaw held a higher position on the left, while Diogo Dalot remained deeper on the right.
The second line was formed by Casemiro and Kobbie Mainoo, who operated as a double pivot.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 4 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulbu2.png)
Fulham responded with a high press in a 4-1-3-2 shape.
Emile Smith Rowe and Raúl Jiménez pressed the two centre-backs, with Jiménez initiating the press on Martínez, while Smith Rowe waited for the ball to reach Maguire before stepping forward and blocking the passing lane to Casemiro.
Behind them, Alex Iwobi positioned himself between Manchester United’s double pivot, ready to press the player closest to the ball.
On the left, Samuel Chukwueze closed the channel in front of the centre-back, while also preparing to press Dalot if the ball was played to the right full-back.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 5 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulbu3.png)
Manchester United’s idea was to use Casemiro to draw Iwobi out of position.
Iwobi followed the near-side holding midfielder wide, opening a passing lane from Dalot to Mainoo.
This was supported by Jiménez being close to the left centre-back or the goalkeeper, while Sander Berge, Fulham’s other holding midfielder, did not step in to assist.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 6 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulbu4.png)
This sequence highlights why Berge did not push forward, as he was tasked with following Bruno Fernandes, who was positioned centrally.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 7 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulbu5.png)
The move developed successfully, allowing Manchester United to break Fulham’s high press and advance up the pitch.
This led to a big chance created through Amad Diallo, who dribbled past Fulham’s left full-back before producing a shot on target.
Casemiro Problems In Possession
Although he scored the first Manchester United goal of the game, Casemiro has some problems that don’t help United get out from under pressure with the ball.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 8 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulbu6.png)
Another solution used by Manchester United emerged when Iwobi was unable to follow Casemiro.
Maguire, operating as the right centre-back, found an open passing lane into Casemiro, particularly when Casemiro positioned himself higher than Chukwueze.
This positioning allowed Casemiro to receive behind Fulham’s first line of pressure.
Maguire also used an effective body shape to influence Chukwueze into opening the channel, enabling the pass to Casemiro, who was positioned outside Smith Rowe’s cover shadow.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 9 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulbu7.png)
The issue in this situation lay in Casemiro’s body shape while receiving the ball.
Taking the pass with a closed and square stance made it difficult for him to turn.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 10 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulbu8.png)
This allowed Berge to shift his focus from Fernandes to Casemiro, ensuring that Casemiro was denied the opportunity to turn.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 11 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulbu9.png)
In the second half, Manchester United continued with the same approach.
Maguire again looked for the pass into Casemiro, but it was unavailable due to Casemiro holding the same height as Chukwueze.
Also, the Fulham winger maintained his position to close the channel and force play wide towards Dalot.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 12 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulbu10.png)
This time, Dalot chose not to play into Mainoo centrally and instead passed to Casemiro, who drifted wide into the space behind Chukwueze.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 13 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulbu11.png)
Although Casemiro received the ball facing forward on this occasion, he failed to select an effective or simple pass, which prevented Manchester United from retaining possession.
Manchester United Progression & Final Third
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 14 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulpr1.png)
Against Fulham’s mid-press, Manchester United adopted a 3-2-5 structure.
Dalot formed the third player in the first line alongside Maguire and Martínez.
The second line remained unchanged, with Casemiro and Mainoo operating as a double pivot.
On the left, Cunha tucked inside to join Fernandes and Mbeumo in the central areas.
Shaw advanced high from left full-back to hold the width, while Diallo provided width on the right side.
Fulham defended in a 4-4-2 shape during their mid-press.
The two forwards focused on Manchester United’s holding midfielders, while the two central midfielders tracked Fernandes and Cunha.
Harry Maguire Diagonal Long Ball To The Left Side
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 16 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulpr3.png)
With Fulham’s full-back drawn out by Manchester United’s left winger, space opened up in front of Shaw.
Maguire is prepared to exploit this by playing a long diagonal pass in behind for Shaw to attack that space.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 17 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulpr4.png)
The issue was the execution of the pass.
Maguire’s long ball was inaccurate and ended up behind Shaw, forcing him to run back towards the ball rather than receiving it while moving forward beyond Fulham’s defensive line.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 18 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulpr5.png)
In another sequence, Maguire again attempted to target the space on Fulham’s right side with a pass towards Shaw.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 19 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulpr6.png)
Once more, the pass lacked accuracy, and this time the ball ran completely out of play.
Switch The Play To Put Diallo In A 1v1 Situation
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 20 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulpr7.png)
As the game progressed, Wilson began tracking Shaw more aggressively to close him down.
This allowed Martínez to move wider and receive a pass from Maguire in the space Wilson had vacated, creating an opportunity to advance.
With Iwobi also focused on blocking Cunha’s passing lane, this space became even larger.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 21 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulpr8.png)
Martínez received the ball as Cunha dropped deeper, occupying Iwobi.
At the same time, Mainoo attempted to move out of Smith Rowe’s cover shadow to offer a passing option.
From this moment, Fernandes began to attack the space between Fulham’s centre-back and full-back.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 22 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulpr9.png)
Another recurring idea for Manchester United was switching play to Diallo on the right wing, aiming to isolate him in one-versus-one situations, where he excels.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 23 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulpr10.png)
Manchester United also looked to exploit runs from Fernandes in behind Fulham’s defensive line.
Distracting The Defensive Line
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 24 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulpr11.png)
Another important mechanism involved the positioning of the centre-forward Mbeumo, Cunha on the left, Diallo on the right, and Fernandes.
Diallo held the width, occupying Fulham’s left full-back.
Meanwhile, Mbeumo and Fernandes positioned themselves between the centre-backs and full-backs, making it more difficult for Fulham’s centre-backs to step out and engage them.
This sequence began with a pass from Dalot into Mbeumo, who was unmarked and able to link play to help Manchester United progress.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 25 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulpr12.png)
This movement allowed Manchester United to break Fulham’s press and create a major chance, with Mbeumo receiving a pass in behind the defensive line inside the box.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 26 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulpr13.png)
The same concept was evident in the second goal, with Cunha’s positioning before receiving the ball allowing him to direct the finish into the back of the net.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 27 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulpr14.png)
In the winning goal in the final minute, Manchester United once again relied on their most effective weapons throughout the match.
The move started with a long diagonal ball to Diallo, creating a 1v1 situation.
Fernandes’ starting position, between the full-back and centre-back, was also clear.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 28 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulpr15.png)
Fernandes dragged the centre-back wide before attempting to receive a pass from Dalot.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 29 manchester-united-fulham-premier-league-2025-2026-analysis-tactics](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/munvsfulpr16.png)
Fernandes then dribbled past the centre-back and delivered a cross to Šeško, who scored the winning goal at the final moment.
Conclusion
After overcoming the Cottagers, Manchester United find themselves in a strong position.
They sit fourth in the table, a UEFA Champions League qualifying spot, and have now recorded three consecutive league victories, all under Michael Carrick.
It is clear that Manchester United has a few ideas they are trying to implement, but a lack of detail remains evident.
At times, this comes down to individual technical execution, while in other moments it relates to the absence of clear tactical solutions during the match.
Despite securing all three points with a last-minute winner, there are still several areas where Manchester United needs to improve.
![Manchester United Vs Fulham [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: How United Won Despite Structural Gaps – Tactical Analysis 1 Arsenal 2-3 Man United - tactical analysis](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Arsenal-2-3-Man-United-tactical-analysis-750x375.png)
