MLS 2019: Seattle Sounders vs Vancouver Whitecaps

Looking back the last weekend MLS fixture of Seattle Sounders vs Vancouver Whitecaps where the home side was able to score that gives them a late victory. This tactical analysis will investigate how Vancouver Whitecaps were almost able to do a clean sheet and draw with Seattle Sounders. Moreover, it will reveal the crucial tactics that both teams applied against the ball. Team news Seattle Sounders are in a quite bad shape recently as they really struggled in MLS. They recorded three losses and one draw in their last five games. Therefore they must need to win this game. Due to the squad rotation, there were several changes. Starting with the centre-forward position where Brian Schmetzer employed Justin Dhillon instead of the regular starter Raúl Ruidíaz or Will Bruin who played in the previous match, against Montreal Impact. Also, a big change was to choose Gustav Svensson and Danny Leyva to the double pivot role, rather than the usual Roldan-Delem duo. Compare to the Montreal game where Alex Roldan and Handwalla Bwana played, now Henry Wingo and Joevin Jones named as the wingers, whilst Harry Shipp stepped up to the #10 role instead of Víctor Rodríguez. On the other hand, Vancouver Whitecaps has a pretty interesting form as they made five draws in their last six MLS games. Probably due to the fact that their tactics focusing on a strong defence. It also proves by the stats, they have an average 1.32 conceded goals per game whilst 1.1 scored goal per game. Whitecaps now lined up in a 4-3-1-2 formation in order to match up the opposition shape in the midfield. Marc Dos Santos often changes formations according to the opponent. [caption id="attachment_44941" align="aligncenter" width="600"] Vancouver used several formations so far.[/caption] Hwang In-beom moved up and occupied behind the attackers, Fredy Montero and Yordy Reyna. Therefore, Victor Pagliari Giro (PC) took In-beom place next to Felipe Campanholi Martins and Jon Erice. Whilst the usual four men line in defence. Vancouver in possession Although Seattle Sounders had a bit bigger possession ( 55% ), Vancouver still had the ball in a considerable portion of the time, especially in the opening minutes where they dominated on the ball. Therefore, it necessary to look into how the Sounders set up their pressing scheme to negate Whitecaps’ ball progression. Starting with the basic structure for both sides. In possession, Erice - as the deepest midfielder - dropped between the central defenders to create a strong ball circulation. Thus Nerwinski and Adnan could step further up the pitch which moved their structure from the base 4-3-1-2 to 3-4-1-2. [caption id="attachment_44945" align="aligncenter" width="600"] Vancouver's formation during build-up and Seattle's pressing scheme.[/caption] Meanwhile, the Sounders’ 4-2-3-1 formation morphed into a 4-4-2 or 4-2-2-2 in pressing. This means, Shipp often occupied next to Dhillon and focused on covering the passing lanes to the midfield. The only time they started to actually put pressure on the centre-backs was when they attempted to drive forward on the ball. Moreover, Jones and Wingo stayed around the wing or half-spaces. Leyva and Svensson had an auxiliary role as they positioned in the centre close to Victor and Martins. When the ball moved wide, they shifted to the side to the wing to cover the nearby eight. Whilst the wingers also shifted to the flank and pressed the full-backs. [caption id="attachment_44962" align="aligncenter" width="1200"] Seattle stopping the opponent's build-up.[/caption] This often caused issues in the build-up for Vancouver which made difficult for them to reach the final third. One of the tactics to overcome Seattle's press was in this situation below. As you may see, due to Vancouver passed from the wing to the centre, Seattle's first line could not close in quick enough thus Erice was able to pass in between them towards Martins who dropped there to offer a passing option. Although it was a good way to exploit the opponent press, Seattle were able to stop this progression with quick shifting. The winger, Jones instantly moved out to press the opposite winger who received the pass from Martins. Seattle’s offensive difficulties The home side favoured the lateral zones in their attacks which were useful since the opponent’s narrow formation focused on denying the central progression. Seattle's tactics was to create crossing opportunity to play the ball to the box, especially with a ground pass thus the attackers could get in a shooting opportunity. As the image shows below, Vancouver's formation matched the opponent's 2v1 staggering in the middle. Which means, the two Vancouver strikers covered Seattle's centre-backs and pressed them to force the ball wide. Whilst In-Beom marked the centre-midfielder. [caption id="attachment_44953" align="aligncenter" width="600"] Vancouver blocking off the opponent from the centre.[/caption] Once Sounders were forced to the wings and progressed up the pitch there, they met the second hindrance. Whitecaps aimed to close down the wings with second-line shifting, thus the midfield trio aggressively moved out to the ball side to block the way and isolate the home side’s players. [caption id="attachment_44955" align="aligncenter" width="600"] Whitecaps shifting to the ball side to close down the wing in front of Seattle.[/caption] Having said that, time to time, Seattle were able to create longer possession os spells at the opponent’s half. However, they had to face with the opposition compact low block which limited Seattle’s actions to the wings. In these situations, the ball sided centre-midfielder joined the full-back to create numerically equal situation against Seattle’s winger and full-back. [caption id="attachment_44957" align="aligncenter" width="400"] Vancouver's compact low block.[/caption] In their wing play, Seattle frequently used positional rotations or oppositional movements to disorganise the oppositional defence but it was ineffective against’s Vancouver due to the fact that they did not follow the opponents that rigidly. Thus in overall, Seattle lacked the tool to create a breakthrough. Possible solutions There was at least one situation where Seattle showed a possible way to exploit the away side’s defence. Due to the fact that Vancouver used strong shifting movement to the ball side to close down the ball side, it creates huge space on the far side. In the 10th minutes, Seattle takes advantage of that with a quick switch of play to the far side towards the advancing right back. [caption id="attachment_44948" align="aligncenter" width="1200"] Switch of play as a possible solution for Seattle Sounders.[/caption] Nevertheless, it was way too rare to rely on that and was not a conscious action, but it would be a good way to use that weapon against a defence like this. Furthermore, a few seconds later than the previous situation, Seattle showed another example of how to exploit Vancouver’s defence, although with a small but important flaw. [caption id="attachment_44950" align="aligncenter" width="1200"] Good tactics: pinning back the nearby central defender. Thus he could not move out to track the run.[/caption] In here, the Seattle were isolated again on the wing but they managed to pull the full-back and the ball-near central midfielder out of position which creates some space that Shipp filled with a horizontal movement. However, the nearby centre-back was able to move out and track his run which denied that option. As you may see, the problem was here that the striker occupied Rose instead of pinning back Godoy thus allowing Shipp to fill the vacated space without a marker. Conclusion As this analysis showed, both sides reduced the opposition threat and made hard to create scoring chances for the opponent. Statistically, it is also clear that both teams lacked the chances. Vancouver Whitecaps had 1.06 expected goals which are lower than their average ( 1.23 xG ). On the other hand, Seattle Sounders had a 1.53 xG but truth to be told, it is the same as they average goalscoring record in this season ( 1.5 goals per match). If you love tactical analysis, then you’ll love the digital magazines from totalfootballanalysis.com – a guaranteed 100+ pages of pure tactical analysis covering topics from the Premier League, Serie A, La Liga, Bundesliga and many, many more. Buy your copy of the June issue for just ₤4.99 here , or even better sign up for a ₤50 annual membership (12 monthly issues plus the annual review) right here .

MLS 2019: Seattle Sounders vs Vancouver Whitecaps – tactical analysis

Daniel Garai

Related Posts

PSG Vs Newcastle United [1–1] – Champions League 2025/2026: A Tactical Arm-Wrestle In Paris – Tactical Analysis

Napoli Vs Chelsea [2–3] – Champions League 2025/2026: How Game Management Cost Antonio Conte – Tactical Analysis

Arsenal Vs Manchester United [2–3] – Premier League 2025/2026: How Michael Carrick Punished Mikel Arteta – Tactical Analysis

AS Roma Vs AC Milan [1–1] – Serie A 2025/2026: Gian Piero Gasperini Man-Marking & Max Allegri Counterattacks – Tactical Analysis

Derby County Vs West Brom [1–1] – EFL Championship 2025/2026: Set-Piece Chaos & Missed Momentum – Tactical Analysis

Bayern Munich Vs Augsburg [1-2] – Bundesliga 2025/2026: Bayern’s First League Defeat – Tactical Analysis

Ferland Mendy 2018/19 - scout report

Luis Muriel 2018/19 - scout report

FIFA Women's World Cup 2019: England vs Sweden - tactical preview

Welcome Back!

Create New Account!

Retrieve your password

Are you sure want to unlock this post?

Are you sure want to cancel subscription?