FAWSL 2019/20: Chelsea Women vs Manchester United Women – tactical preview
After the WSL cup and the international break, the FAWSL finally returns to action with matchday six. There are plenty of high profile matches taking place this weekend including the Merseyside derby between Liverpool and Everton. Tottenham takes on Arsenal in the London derby and arguably the biggest game of the weekend is between Chelsea and Manchester United.
The two teams have had contrasting starts to the season with the Blues finding themselves at the top of the table playing some scintillating football. The Red Devils, on the other hand, have played good football but haven’t won as many points as their performances have warranted. Having kept Arsenal and Manchester City to one goal, United have shown they have what it takes to stay afloat and eventually compete in the league.
Chelsea, meanwhile, have ambitions of winning the league. With no Champions League football to contend with, many are giving the Blues a major chance of picking up silverware ahead of Manchester City and Arsenal.
This tactical analysis preview will look to dissect and understand the different areas of strengths and weaknesses the two teams possess and how they can be exploited to gain three valuable points.
Tactical Analysis – Chelsea Women’s style of play
Manchester United Women’s style of play
Against top-quality opposition, United look to play on the counter-attack using the pace of Leah Galton, Lauren James, Jackie Groenen, and Kirsty Hanson. The four bring individual qualities and strengths that have troubled teams going forward. Their 4-5-1 gives them defensive solidarity and aims to tighten up spaces between their defence. Katie Zelem and Hayley Ladd usually patrol the defensive midfield area effectively, sweeping up any loose balls providing Manchester United with a solid foundation to build off of.
Manchester United Women – Defensive structure
For Manchester United to have any success against the league leaders, they will need to rely on their solid defensive structure. Having limited Arsenal and Manchester City in their opening fixtures has shown incredible resilience against two of the most feared attacks in the league. They followed a rigid out-of-possession structure against both teams with Zelem recycling possession and initiating counter-attacks.
Using a hybrid 4-1-4-1/4-4-2, United always want to secure their midfield to not allow the opposition teams to transition through the lines of midfield quickly. Ladd would fill in positions that were vacated or needed extra protection providing ultimate coverage across the back four. As we mentioned earlier, against the bigger sides, United tend to adopt a low compact block in an attempt to keep it tight and organised at the back and play on the counter-attack.
They aim to win back possession in central midfield to try and catch teams out and quickly transition with their quick, intelligent attacking players. West Ham approached their game against Chelsea in similar fashion by trying to keep their shape and moderate Chelsea’s attacks. They employed a more man-marking system which United could look to replicate. They usually try and add numbers in the central areas to frustrate teams into taking long shots or having to play try their luck in the wide areas.
The above example shows her stationed in a defensive position looking to press Katie McCabe. This will offer Turner more protection and keep Manchester United Women much more compact in the wide areas. Against Manchester City Women she engaged in 20 duels and winning 10, showing her willingness to track back and work hard to protect her right-back.
While this has been a point of strength for Manchester United, they have been susceptible to quick, pacey, technical wingers getting in behind. Both Tottenham and Liverpool found joy in behind Manchester United’s full-backs. This is an area Chelsea will definitely look to exploit once again. Both of United’s full-backs are defensive and although they stay deeper are found against pace.
Rinsola Babajide was particularly menacing down Liverpool’s right-hand side against United and constantly found space in behind. She took advantage of some sloppy passing that further aggravated United’s weakness at the back. If they afford Chelsea the same space and gift them possession then the scoreline could be big. Chelsea’s forwards are much more proficient and effective in the final third meaning they will not leave chances go begging.
Manchester United’s counter-attack
Stoney’s main tactic has been to provide a solid foundation to launch clinical counter-attacks with quick transitions from back to front. The biggest threat United have going forward is being able to exploit is unorganised defences after they have had a period of possession. United have had an average possession of 43.95% this season showing their preference to stay off-the-ball than on it.
As we’ve seen in the previous section, United are very effective in keeping the central areas protected and look towards Zelem to propel the team forward. She is critical for United from her defensive midfield position using her excellent range of passing and vision to initiate smart counter-attacks. The ability to transition from defence to attack is important to allow the likes of Galton, James, and Groenen to attack. With only 311.6 passes per 90 they utilise a direct style of passing compared to their opponents (403.4 passes per 90).
Ideally, they will need to overrun the midfield pivot of Ji So-yun and Sofie Ingle if they want to stand any chance of getting at the Chelsea defence. Chelsea’s wingers aren’t known to track back a whole lot but do so in certain situations, so that is one area United can look at taking advantage. Galton is particularly dangerous down United’s left-hand side and will give Maren Mjelde a tough time at right-back. Galton has attempted 5.53 dribbles per 90 this season with a 62.1% success rate. This proves her effectiveness going forward and finding spaces in behind the opposition full-backs. She isn’t afraid to take a shot either with an average of 2.48 per 90.
Chelsea Women’s attacking threat
Arguably Chelsea Women’s biggest threat will come from their forwards. Kirby, England, Ji, and Reiten will pose the biggest threat to Manchester United’s defence. Their biggest win came against Arsenal Women three weeks ago and their style of play was different from what played against West Ham and what they would expect to play against Manchester United. Against their London rivals, they had 41% possession attributing to their counter-attacking style of play. Indeed their equalising goal came courtesy of some good pressing by Erin Cuthbert to release the front three. However, against West Ham, they had 56% possession and managed to come back to win 1-3 after going 1-0 down.
Chelsea have shown resiliency and ability to adapt to their opposition to play to their strengths. They have averaged 2.2 goals this season so goals should be expected. After moving towards a more fluid 4-4-2 they have been able to create a fluid and flexible system that allows Reiten, England, Kirby, and Ji to flourish. One of their many problems last year was to integrate England, Kirby, and Ji in the same starting eleven. Hayes has managed to fix the issue by changing from a 4-2-3-1 to a 4-4-2. The two wingers complement each other with Reiten able to interchange between a winger and wide forward helping out England when Kirby drops into midfield. Cuthbert acts as the hardworking, pressing winger who supports in midfield if required.
The two wide players will look to run in behind United’s full-backs. Even though United will look to keep their wide areas overloaded, it’ll allow Chelsea to create space in other areas of the pitch. If Chelsea find even the smallest of spaces in behind they will look to take full advantage.
Defensive stability
Chelsea have been efficient and effective from a defensive standpoint. With only three goals conceded this season, their back four have been solid in defence and kept teams at bay. The back four consisting of Mjelde, Millie Bright, Magdalena Eriksson, and Jonna Andersson have been consistent and able to sweep up anything played in behind due their mixture of pace and strength. Bright is an aggressive centre-back while Eriksson will provide cover when she pushes up. The two full-backs are balanced with Mjelde usually sitting deeper than Andersson who prefers to bomb forward. With help from Ingle in shoring up the central areas they have been able to repel most attacks.
However, if we examine and conduct an analysis on their three goals conceded there is a common theme in each occurrence. Each of their goals have come from not being able to clear their lines in the penalty area. The goals scored by Reading and West Ham specifically show the Chelsea defenders not able to clear the ball properly and fail to close down the second ball winner. The goal conceded against Arsenal was similar because of Danielle van de Donk’s brilliant feet in the box that both Bright and Eriksson failed to handle.
Manchester United are a dangerous counter-attacking side and with James, Galton, and Groenen can manoeuvre through unorganised defences with ease. James is a special talent with incredible ball-playing ability at such a young age. Chelsea will need to wary of her movement in the penalty area just as she did in devastating fashion against Liverpool. She doesn’t require too much space to operate.
Expected lineups
Chelsea comes into the game off the back of a comeback win against West Ham and an impressive victory over Arsenal before that. Since then they have suffered one major injury in Maria Thorisdóttir. The Norwegian will be out for the remainder of 2019 after fracturing her leg in the lead up to the West Ham fixture. Thorisdóttir struck the late winner in the Blues’ previous Women’s Super League game as they overcame Arsenal. Chelsea will be expected to field their strongest line up for this game.
The Manchester United Women’s starting eleven should constitute with the same core group of players with the exception of the full-back areas. Stoney has consistently rotated her full-backs and will look to play her two strongest defenders at the back. They are expected to continue with the 4-2-3-1 formation that has served them well this season.
Chelsea Women: Berger; Mjelde, Bright, Eriksson, Andersson; Reiten, Ingle, Ji, Cuthbert; Kirby, England
Manchester United Women: Earps; A. Turner, McManus, M.Turner, Harris; Ladd, Zelem; Hanson, Groenen, Galton; James
Conclusion
Even though Chelsea are favourites for this tie, I expect this to be a tight-knit affair with Manchester United defending deep. They will look to apply as much pressure as possible to force Chelsea to come up with answers to break down their sturdy defence. Having kept Arsenal and Manchester City to one-goal deficits, it’s hard to imagine anything different tactically from Stoney’s side.
Hayes will want a repeat of their heroics against Arsenal and dogged, ruthless mentality against West Ham. If they want to establish themselves as title challengers winning games like this is necessary. It’ll come down to the two teams effectiveness in playing to their strengths. So for these reasons, we’ll go with a narrow 2-1 victory to the Blues.
If you love tactical analysis, then you’ll love the digital magazines from totalfootballanalysis.com – a guaranteed 100+ pages of pure tactical analysis covering topics from the Premier League, Serie A, La Liga, Bundesliga and many, many more. Buy your copy of the November issue for just ₤4.99 here