The third matchday of the Belgian Pro League had some interesting matchups on the programme. One of them being the game between Standard Liege and Genk.
Standard were on maximum points going into this game by winning their opening games against Cercle Brugge with coach Paul Clement who is former assistant coach at Bayern Munichen, Paris Saint-Germain and Real Madrid.
Genk, on the other hand, had a rather difficult start to the campaign. Although Wolf’s team did secure four points out of six, the way they did it wasn’t very convincing. With this in mind, Genk were eager to show what they are capable of in this intriguing encounter.
The match finished in a goalless draw and while a draw was fair, the match could have gone either way, with many interesting tactical ploys from both teams. This tactical analysis will break the match down into various game moments to provide analysis and insights into the tactics utilised by them.
Lineups and formations
Philippe Montanier started with his preferred 4-3-3. The goalkeeper, Arnaud Bodart was well protected by Konstantinos Laifis, Nicolas Gavory, Ngoran Suiru Fai Collins and Mërgim Vojvoda. The midfield comprised of Gojko Cimirot, Nicolas Raskin, Selim Amallah. And lastly, the attacking trio consisted of Felipe Nicolás Avenatti, Aleksandar Boljević and Maxime Lestienne.
Hannes Wolf started in a 4-4-2 formation on paper. Hannes Wolf started in a 4-4-2 formation on paper. It was a 4-4-2 out of possession but when in possession one of the strikers drop into midfield to create a 4-3-3. Daniel Vuković started in goal for Genk. The defence consisted of Jere Uronen, Jhon Janer, Lucumí Carlos, Cuesta Figueroa and Joakim Mæhle. The centre of midfield was occupied by Danie Muñoz and Eboue Kouassi. Whilst the flanks consisted of Junya Ito and Théo Bongonda. Ebere Onuachu and Cyriel Dessers led the line for Genk.
Genk’s wide dynamics
Genk started the game with a rather attacking intent. This faded away the longer the game went on. Genk would build in a 2-2 stagger, where the two pivots would sit in front of the two centre-backs. Below Kouassi sprints to the far side to create a rectangular shape with the two centre-backs and Muñoz.


![Chelsea Vs Arsenal [2–3] – EFL Cup Semi-Final First Leg 2025/2026: Pressing, Precision & Defensive Fault Lines – Tactical Analysis 4 Chelsea Vs Arsenal - tactical analysis](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Chelsea-Vs-Arsenal-tactical-analysis-1-350x250.png)
![Borussia Dortmund Vs Werder Bremen [3–0] – Bundesliga 2025/2026: Second-Half Changes Decide A Deceptive Scoreline – Tactical Analysis 5 Borussia Dortmund Vs Werder Bremen 20252026 - tactical analysis](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Dortmund-Vs-Werder-20252026-tactical-analysis-350x250.png)
![Inter Milan Vs Napoli [2–2] – Serie A 2025/2026: High Pressing, Defensive Gaps & A Costly Stalemate – Tactical Analysis 6 Inter Milan 2-2 Napoli - tactical analysis](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Inter-Milan-2-2-Napoli-tactical-analysis-1-350x250.png)
![Manchester City Vs Brighton [1–1] – Premier League 2025/2026: Why Pep Guardiola Tactics Dominated But Failed To Win – Tactical Analysis 7 Man City Vs Brighton 20252026](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Man-City-Vs-Brighton-20252026-350x250.png)
![Burnley Vs Manchester United [2–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: The First Steps Of The Post-Rúben Amorim Era – Tactical Analysis 8 Burnley Vs Manchester United [2–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: The Red Devils New Ideas And Potential Tactical Changes – Tactical Analysis](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Burnley-2-2-Manchester-United-tactical-analysis-350x250.png)

