The Copa América clash between Uruguay and Panama was a tactical feast that kept fans on the edge of their seats. As these two teams clashed on the field, their strategic approaches were evident, with each team showcasing distinct tactical game plans that highlighted their strengths and exposed their vulnerabilities.
This tactical analysis piece delves into the tactical aspects of the match, providing an analysis of both teams tactics on the pitch.
Looking ahead, well also explore the strategies that Uruguay and Panama might employ in their upcoming fixtures as they seek to capitalise on their experience from this encounter and refine their approaches for future matches.
Both Teams Tactical Setups
Marcelo Bielsa successfully implemented his signature philosophy into the Uruguayan team, which was characterised by aggressive man-marking, counter-pressing with a high line, and a build-up in a 3-4-3 formation. For this match, Panama chose a 4-5-1 defensive setup, aiming to counter Uruguays two-line defensive lines. While Panamas strategy seemed effective for about 35 minutes of dominance in the match, they ultimately failed to earn any points due to their inability to finish their chances effectively.
In the image below, we can observe both Panamas defensive formation and Uruguays attacking strategy. Uruguay deployed extremely high full-backs to stretch Panamas mid-block and create space for midfielders to advance into attacking positions alongside striker Darwin Núñez.
Conversely, Panamas setup was stretched wider, leaving gaps that allowed Uruguays full-backs ample room to execute crosses into the box or facilitate easier passing sequences with midfielders. This set the stage for a classic tactical duel: Uruguay’s 3-4-3 offensive alignment versus Panamas 5-4-1 defensive mid-block. Although Panama ultimately lost the match 3-1, their defensive setup managed to contain Uruguay effectively until the final minutes—around the 85th minute—when their players began to lose stamina and could no longer perform at full capacity, where Uruguay finished the match off with a second goal.
Below is another image displaying the same exact tactical setup from both teams in another segment of the first half of the match. This illustrates how consistently both teams applied their strategies throughout the game.
Uruguay Build-up
Uruguays



![Manchester City Vs Brighton [1–1] – Premier League 2025/2026: Why Pep Guardiola Tactics Dominated But Failed To Win – Tactical Analysis 4 Man City Vs Brighton 20252026](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Man-City-Vs-Brighton-20252026-350x250.png)
![Burnley Vs Manchester United [2–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: The First Steps Of The Post-Rúben Amorim Era – Tactical Analysis 5 Burnley Vs Manchester United [2–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: The Red Devils New Ideas And Potential Tactical Changes – Tactical Analysis](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Burnley-2-2-Manchester-United-tactical-analysis-350x250.png)

![Bournemouth Vs Tottenham Hotspur [3–2] – Premier League 2025/2026: Andoni Iraola Plan Exposes Spurs Problems – Tactical Analysis 7 Bournemouth Vs Spurs 20252026](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Bournemouth-Vs-Spurs-20252026-350x250.png)

