Chelsea came into this match with a fantastic opportunity to move into sole possession of third place in the table with Tottenham, Arsenal, and Manchester United all dropping points at the weekend. The opportunity was squandered as a dominant attacking performance was undone through poor defending on set pieces. Set piece goals from Burnley’s Jeff Hendrick and Ashley Barnes negated the enormous Chelsea advantage in the run of play.
The possession advantage for the match was 74% to 26% in favour of Chelsea while the xG numbers from wyscout.com ended with 2.17 for the Londoners and 0.58 for Burnley. Using tactical analysis and statistics we will look at how Chelsea broke down Burnley’s two blocks of four and how Burnley succeeded on their two set-piece opportunities.
Lineups
The home team, Chelsea, came out in a 4-3-3 formation. Kepa Arrizabalaga was in goal, with Emerson Palmieri, David Luiz, Andreas Christensen and captain César Azpilicueta in the backline. Jorginho anchored the midfield with Ruben Loftus-Cheek and NGolo Kanté. Eden Hazard, Gonzalo Higuaín, and Callum Hudson-Odoi made up the front line.
Burnley countered with a 4-4-2 formation, naming Ashley Barnes and Chris Wood up top. A midfield block of four consisted of Jeff Hendrick, Ashley Westwood, Jack Cork and Dwight McNeil. The four-man defence was Matthew Lowton, James Tarkowski, Ben Mee and Charlie Taylor. The captain Tom Heaton played in goal.

Burnley set pieces
Wyscout.com had Burnley with four shots for the match and an xG of 0.58. They scored from a corner kick that was a 0.04 xG chance and a free kick that was a 0.54 xG chance. Their other two shots registered less than 0.01 xG. The only chances that registered xG were the two set-piece goals. Burnley were thoroughly dominated by Chelsea in every area except set pieces and the scoreline.
Jeff Hendrick goal off a corner kick
The setup for the goal by Hendrick saw Burnley commit five players around the six yard area with three players at the top of the box. Chelsea countered this by putting 10 players around the six yard box and Hazard wide to take away any short options.

![Manchester United Vs Manchester City [2–0] – Premier League 2025/2026: Michael Carrick’s First Big Statement – Tactical Analysis 3 Manchester United Vs Manchester City Premier League 20252026](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Man-United-Vs-Man-City-Premier-League-20252026-350x250.png)
![RB Leipzig Vs Bayern Munich [1–5] – Bundesliga 2025/2026: Vincent Kompany's Second-Half Reset – Tactical Analysis 4 RB Leipzig 1-5 Bayern Munich](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/RB-Leipzig-1-5-Bayern-Munich-1-350x250.png)
![PSG Vs Lille [3–0] – Ligue 1 2025/2026: Ruthless Efficiency Versus Attacking Waste – Tactical Analysis 5 PSG Vs Lille [3–0] – Ligue 1 2025/2026: Why LOSC Failed To Exploit PSG Defensive Weaknesses – Tactical Analysis](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/PSG-Vs-Lille-20252026-350x250.png)

![Chelsea Vs Arsenal [2–3] – EFL Cup Semi-Final First Leg 2025/2026: Pressing, Precision & Defensive Fault Lines – Tactical Analysis 7 Chelsea Vs Arsenal - tactical analysis](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Chelsea-Vs-Arsenal-tactical-analysis-1-350x250.png)
![Borussia Dortmund Vs Werder Bremen [3–0] – Bundesliga 2025/2026: Second-Half Changes Decide A Deceptive Scoreline – Tactical Analysis 8 Borussia Dortmund Vs Werder Bremen 20252026 - tactical analysis](https://totalfootballanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Dortmund-Vs-Werder-20252026-tactical-analysis-350x250.png)