Niko Kovač Tactics At Bayern Munich 2019/20

After disastrous performances in recent matches, Bayern Munich sacked their head coach Niko Kovac . Under the Croatian coach, Bayern often failed to break down deep defensive blocks. In addition to that, Kovac's side has even started to struggle with defensive issues this season. In this tactical analysis , we explain Kovac's tactical problems at Bayern that led to his dismissal. Missing half-space occupation Bayern 's attacking philosophy revolved around attacking down the wings under Kovac. But e ven if attacking down the flanks, it is useful to position players in more central areas. [caption id="attachment_62859" align="aligncenter" width="1420"] With the space between the lines in the half-space being unoccupied, the opposition can already prepare to defend in wide areas.[/caption] That would occupy opposition players within the centre and, therefore, create space on the wings. Moreover, Bayern's wingers could get immediate support within the half-space once receiving the ball. Without this support, Bayern's winger is often outnumbered, as opposition teams are often well prepared to support their full-backs on the wing. [caption id="attachment_62857" align="aligncenter" width="1428"] Since there is no player positioned in the ball near half-space, Augsburg's midfielder can support his teammates on the wing. As a result, Bayern's wide players are outnumbered.[/caption] But the structural issues of Bayern already began in the build-up phase. When playing in a 4-3-3 system, Bayern's advanced midfielders would position themselves high up the pitch while the single pivot played close to the central defenders. That is not a bad concept in general since it creates space for the build-up players to carry the ball into. [caption id="attachment_62865" align="aligncenter" width="1430"] Due to the high positioning of Bayern's advanced midfielders, there is space behind the first line of press. Bayern's central defender receives the ball and could carry the ball up the pitch.[/caption] However, this strategy did not suit the abilities of Bayern's centre-backs who rather played the ball out to their full-backs instead of utilising the free space. As a consequence, advanced midfielder Thiago often dropped into deeper positions again to collect the ball. [caption id="attachment_62864" align="aligncenter" width="1424"] Central midfielder Thiago drops into a deeper position to collect the ball as their centre-backs seem uncomfortable with utilising the free space.[/caption] But this resulted in the fact Bayern missed a player between the lines. Often, Bayern would, therefore, leave the ball far half-space unoccupied, which made it impossible for them to switch play without playing backward. In addition to that, the opposition can keep a compact shape on the ball near the side due to the fact that there is no risk of being outplayed with a pass into the ball far half-space. [caption id="attachment_62856" align="aligncenter" width="1427"] Bayern now miss a player within the centre or ball far half-space. As a consequence, Augsburg can shift towards the ball side and decrease space, forcing Bayern to play in this crowded area.[/caption] The off-ball movement seemed to depend on the players' preferences and there were only few principles to be recognised. This lack of influence by head coach Kovac was one of the main reasons for his dismissal. U-shape - missing occupation of space between the lines But it was not only the missing occupation of the ball near half-space. Bayern's main issue in possession revolved around their attacking shape. Under Kovac, the German champion often failed to occupy any space between the lines. [caption id="attachment_62860" align="aligncenter" width="1436"] With all Bayern midfielders being positioned wide, there is no central passing option.[/caption] Bayern, therefore, often attacked in a U-shape. This is not only disadvantageous for breaking lines and penetrating the opposition block, but it also entails several disadvantages for counter-pressing, which will be explained at a later stage of our analysis. [caption id="attachment_62855" align="aligncenter" width="1423"] Not a single Bayern player is positioned between the lines. Therefore, Bayern can only play around Augsburg's block.[/caption] The U-shape also disabled Bayern to escape from pressure and switch play if the opposition pressed them on one side. As a consequence, Bayern chose to finish the attack on the side where it started too often. This resulted in attacks which missed the needed patience to break down a defensive block. Often, Kovac’s side would put in crosses from wide areas way too early. That comes along with two negative side effects. Firstly, some Bayern attackers have not taken up positions to threaten the opposition goal or win the second ball. Secondly, the opposition is still organised enough to defend these crosses. The predictability of Bayern’s attacking approach created a huge dependency on the individual brilliance of their attacking trio. Where is the counter-pressing? The mentioned U-shape also had another negative influence on Bayern’s tactics . A quick counter-pressing which enables top teams to dominate the opposition is impossible without a compact shape. The U-shape leads to both a lack of vertical and horizontal compactness since it creates a big hole within the centre of the pitch. [caption id="attachment_62863" align="aligncenter" width="1428"] Augsburg can easily play out of the pressure after regaining possession as Bayern take too long to close the centre.[/caption] Therefore, when Bayern lost possession, their defensive department often needed to drop in order to secure their own goal. Sometimes Bayern’s defenders even got outnumbered on the ball near the side, as they lacked support from the players that were positioned on the ball's far side when they lost the ball. Even in central areas, the distances between Bayern players were often too far to execute aggressive counter-pressing. [caption id="attachment_62862" align="aligncenter" width="1429"] Bayern's ball near players are positioned too far from each other and therefore fail to execute a counter-pressing.[/caption] Bayern's shape decreased their own chances of penetrating the opposition block after quickly regaining the ball while it increased the chance of getting towards the goal for the opposition. Defensive issues In this Bundesliga campaign, Bayern suffered a huge decrease in defensive stability. Compared to an average of 0.91 xGA in 2018/19, they averaged 1.24 xGA so far this season. That was mainly due to poor defensive organization and a press that seemed half-hearted at times. When pressing high up the pitch, their midfielders moved towards one side of the pitch. That left the central space in front of their back line unoccupied. Whenever the opposition was capable of outplaying the press, they could utilise the free space in the centre. [caption id="attachment_62861" align="aligncenter" width="1421"] Since the central midfielders shifted towards the flank, there is uncovered space in front of the back line.[/caption] When Bayern's defensive department dropped in these cases, their wide forwards sometimes missed the willingness to track back. That often allowed the opposition to create promising opportunities by overloading Bayern's full-backs. One common theme was overlapping runs by the opposition full-backs to create a 2v1 situation, as displayed below. [caption id="attachment_62858" align="aligncenter" width="1418"] Olympiakos Piräus can create a 2v1 against Bayern's right-back Joshua Kimmich with an overlapping full-back. Bayern's right winger is still upfield.[/caption] But in general, Bayern's defensive issues were also caused by the insufficient counter-pressing. This led to more attacking opportunities for the opposition than Bayern allowed in the past. Conclusion As our analysis showed, Kovac seemed to be unable to solve Bayern's issues in possession. Especially the poor attacking structure decreased their attacking threat. Because of a missing occupation of areas between the lines, Bayern's focus on wing attacks was way too predictable. Moreover, their U-shape prevented Bayern from executing a counter-pressing, and, as a consequence, Bayern lost its dominance of yesterday under Niko Kovač tactics. It will be interesting to see whether Bayern's next head coach is capable of lending the German record champion a more structured and threatening attacking approach.

Niko Kovač Tactics At Bayern Munich 2019/20 – Tactical Analysis

Max Bergmann

Related Posts

Sean Dyche Tactics At Nottingham Forest 2025/2026: Reshaping Forest For Survival – Tactical Analysis

Bayern Munich Vs Augsburg [1-2] – Bundesliga 2025/2026: Bayern’s First League Defeat – Tactical Analysis

Joel Chima Fujita Scout Report At FC St. Pauli 2025/2026: Bundesliga Quality In A Relegation Fight – Player Analysis

RB Leipzig Vs Bayern Munich [1–5] – Bundesliga 2025/2026: Vincent Kompany’s Second-Half Reset – Tactical Analysis

Borussia Dortmund Vs Werder Bremen [3–0] – Bundesliga 2025/2026: Second-Half Changes Decide A Deceptive Scoreline – Tactical Analysis

Luciano Spalletti Tactics At Juventus 2025/2026: Can His Exciting Philosophy Spark A Late Title Push? – Tactical Analysis

Crewe Alexandra 2019/20: Analysing League Two's surprise package - scout report

La Liga 2019/20: Villarreal vs Athletic Club – tactical analysis

UEFA Champions League 2019/20: Borussia Dortmund vs Inter Milan - tactical analysis

Welcome Back!

Create New Account!

Retrieve your password

Are you sure want to unlock this post?

Are you sure want to cancel subscription?